Real Estate Blog

Foreign investors see the U.S. as the best country to invest in real estate
January 19th, 2010 3:04 PM
Foreign investors in real estate committed to U.S. opportunities

WASHINGTON – Jan. 19, 2010 – Despite a lack of placement opportunities in 2009, foreign investors in real estate say they remain committed to the U.S. as their preferred real estate investment opportunity.

The sentiment is underscored by a dramatic increase in the number of respondents identifying the U.S. as the country providing the best opportunity for real estate capital appreciation, according to the results of the 18th annual Association of Foreign Investors in Real Estate (AFIRE) survey.

The survey was conducted in the fourth quarter of 2009 among the association’s nearly 200 members. Survey respondents own more than $842 billion of real estate globally including $304 billion in the U.S. The survey was conducted by the James A. Graaskamp Center for Real Estate, Wisconsin School of Business.

In this year’s survey:
  • Fifty-one percent of respondents identify the U.S. as providing the best opportunity for capital appreciation;
  • This compares to 37 percent in 2008, 26 percent in 2007, and 23 percent in 2006;
  • The last time respondents’ perceptions for U.S. real estate were this strong was in 2003, when the percentage once again reached 51 percent;
  • The U.K. emerges as the second-best country for capital appreciation, receiving 30 percent of respondents’ votes;
  • In third place, China receives 10 percent of respondents’ votes.
“Although foreign investors expressed every intent to resume investing in 2009, like everyone else, their plans were sidelined by a paralyzed marketplace with no precedent and limited investment opportunities,” said Werner Sohier, senior portfolio manager real estate, PGGM and AFIRE’s newly elected chairman. “However, new money is becoming available and the AFIRE survey points to an increased focus and interest in a few select markets for 2010, especially London and in the US, where prospects appear to be brightening.”

According to survey results:
  • Two thirds of respondents plan to increase their investment in the U.S. in 2010 compared to 2009;
  • Investors say they plan to increase U.S. allocations above 2009 levels by 62 percent for equity and 83 percent for debt; at least half the survey respondents report a stronger appetite for both debt and equity investments in the U.S. than in other countries;
  • Plan for global equity investment in 2010 exceed plans for 2009 by 46 percent; 2010 plans for global debt are 20 percent lower than planned for 2009;
  • By the middle of the fourth quarter of 2009, foreign investors placed only 62 percent of planned debt allocations and 43 percent of planned equity allocations globally; in the U.S. they placed only 35 percent of planned debt allocations and 23 percent of planned equity allocations;
  • As a portion of global real estate, U.S. 2010 allocations for debt represent 80 percent of the global pool; allocations for equity represent 49 percent.
Other U.S. trends

Among U.S. cities representing the best investment opportunities, survey respondents firmly select Washington, D.C. and New York, receiving much stronger scores than third-place San Francisco.

This year, Boston makes a significant climb into fourth place, and Los Angeles falls one spot into fifth place. As they did last year, survey respondents also express a firm interest in multi-family as their preferred property type followed by office, industrial, retail and hotel properties.

“This is the second year in a row in which multi-family topped investors’ product preference,” said James A. Fetgatter, chief executive, AFIRE. “More notably, the gap between the top preference and the least-favored product, hotels, has not been this wide since 2000.”

Survey respondents have also pushed their projections for the recovery of the U.S. commercial real estate market back by six months:
  • In the June 2009 mid-year survey, half the respondents said they expected recovery by or before the second quarter of 2010;
  • In the 2010 annual survey, half the respondents say they expect the recovery by or before the fourth quarter of 2010. But, optimism about the state of the U.S. real estate market remains strong:
  • Thirty-three percent of survey respondents say they are more optimistic about the U.S. real estate market than they were in June 2009;
  • Sixty-three percent say their perspective has not changed;
  • Six percent say they are more pessimistic.

Global Trends Globally three cities emerge as clear targets for investors’ real estate dollars:

London surges into first place with a significant lead over both Washington and New York in second and third places respectively; Paris and Tokyo place as distant fourth- and fifth-place cities;

The United States remains the country selected as the “most stable and secure real estate investment environment,” although with a declining lead:

* The U.S. receives 44 percent of the vote; Germany receives 21 percent; and Canada receives 14 percent.

This year, the percentage of respondents selecting the U.S. as the most “stable and secure country” falls from 53 percent in 2008 and 57 percent in 2007. This is the first time that the U.S. has fallen below 50 percent in the survey’s history.

“The financial crisis of the past year has obviously affected investors’ perceptions of U.S. real estate as ‘stable and secure,’” explains Mr. Fetgatter. “However, it is also apparent that opportunity lies within this instability since the U.S., along with the UK, show substantially higher scoring for expected capital appreciation.”

© 2010 Florida Realtors®

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on January 19th, 2010 3:04 PMPost a Comment (0)

HUD changes seasoning rules for FHA borrowers
January 18th, 2010 7:11 PM
HUD takes action to speed resale of foreclosed properties to new owners

WASHINGTON – Jan. 18, 2010 – In an effort to stabilize home values and improve conditions in communities where foreclosure activity is high, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan announced a temporary policy that will expand access to FHA mortgage insurance to allow for a quicker resale of foreclosed properties. The policy change will permit buyers to use FHA-insured financing to purchase HUD-owned properties, bank-owned properties or properties resold through private sales.

“As a result of the tightened credit market, FHA-insured mortgage financing is often the only means of financing available to potential homebuyers,” says Donovan. “FHA has an unprecedented opportunity to fulfill its mission by helping many homebuyers find affordable housing while contributing to neighborhood stabilization.”

With certain exceptions, FHA currently prohibits insuring a mortgage on a home owned by the seller for less than 90 days. This temporary waiver will give FHA borrowers access to a broader array of recently foreclosed properties.

“This change in policy is temporary and will have very strict conditions and guidelines to assure that predatory practices are not allowed,” Donovan says.

Acquiring, rehabilitating and reselling foreclosed properties to prospective homeowners often takes less than 90 days in today’s market; and FHA’s 90-day rule can adversely impact buyers if a seller is unwilling to hold a property 90 days thanks to holding costs and the risk of vandalism.

“FHA borrowers, because of the restrictions we are now lifting, have often been shut out from buying affordable properties,” says FHA Commissioner David H. Stevens. “This action will enable our borrowers, especially first-time buyers, to take advantage of this opportunity.”

The waiver will take effect on Feb. 1, 2010, and be effective for one year, unless otherwise extended or withdrawn by the FHA Commissioner. To protect FHA borrowers against predatory practices of “flipping,” the waiver is limited to those sales meeting the following general conditions:

• All transactions must be arms-length, with no identity of interest between the buyer and seller or other parties participating in the sales transaction.

• In cases in which the sales price of the property is 20 percent or more above the seller’s acquisition cost, the waiver will only apply if the lender meets specific conditions.

• The waiver is limited to forward mortgages, and does not apply to the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) for purchase program.

• Specific conditions and other details of this new temporary policy are in the text of the waiver, available on HUD’s website:
http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/waivpropflip2010.pdf

© 2010 Florida Realtors®

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on January 18th, 2010 7:11 PMPost a Comment (0)

Modify home loans effect credit scores
January 7th, 2010 8:15 AM

Modified loans on home can hurt your credit score but is better than the alternatives of a short sale and much better than a foreclosure.

The last thing many troubled homeowners want to hear is that they could be denied a car loan after they get a chance to modify their home loan.

But credit scores can get dinged after a home loan modification, making it more costly or tougher to get a loan or credit card.

Hundreds of thousands of homeowners find themselves in a financial squeeze, thanks to the recession and the meltdown in the housing market. Lenders have offered trial loan modifications to more than 700,000 eligible borrowers. As of late November, about 31,000 trial loans have been made permanent, which requires at least three on-time payments under the trial program and proof of income.

What these troubled homeowners don’t realize is that these attempts to avoid foreclosure may result in their credit scores taking a hit.

A potentially damaged credit score is one of those hidden costs of home loan modification – and it varies significantly depending on your lender, as well as when you received your loan modification, your credit history and how your loan was altered.

“They need to tell people up front that this could happen,” said James Sperr, 46, of Belleville, Mich.

Sperr and his wife, Carol, received a trial modification through Bank of America that cut their house payment, including taxes and insurance, to $957 a month from $1,140 a month.

But it came with a hit to the credit score.

“Our credit rating has gone from the 800s to 750,” Carol Sperr said.

“It’s punitive to a consumer who is already scared, frustrated, mad,” said John Ulzheimer, president of consumer education for Credit.com.

The Sperrs said they had never been late or missed a mortgage payment, but their bank had reported them as being behind on payments.

Their credit score took a hit, falling from the 800s to 750.

“They tell us that once the paperwork ‘catches up’ and the new loan is finalized, they will correct the credit reporting agencies,” Carol Sperr said.

No one saw this coming.

“I didn’t find out about our credit until they did a check on this van we bought,” James Sperr said.

He said his wife was able to provide more documentation that their mortgage was in compliance so they did not have to pay a higher rate or get shut out of a loan.

Others aren’t so lucky.

Loan modifications remain a good thing, but they often come with that consequence.

Homeowners who face hardships but cannot traditionally refinance their mortgages can try to get a loan modification. A modification temporarily reduces the monthly payment, which can be helpful if someone’s dealing with a pay cut. Typically, the principal amount owed on the loan is not reduced or changed and the amount of debt owed is not forgiven.

The federal government has programs, and banks and credit unions have proprietary programs as well.

Yet many homeowners feel blindsided when they discover that their credit score has dropped by 50 to 100 points or even more after they entered a trial modification.

“What’s the point of the additional credit damage? What have they just accomplished by doing that to the borrower?” asked John Ulzheimer, president of consumer education for Credit.com.

Good question.

In the first few months after receiving a trial modification, Ulzheimer said, it is possible that the initial payments would show up as a “partial payment plan” on a credit report, which turns into a negative hit to a credit score. This can be a problem even for homeowners who never have missed a mortgage payment.

“It really depends on how the mortgage company decides to report this to a credit agency,” said Julie Bos, group manager and certified credit counselor for GreenPath Inc. in Grand Rapids, Mich.

A homeowner who is behind on payments will see credit score damage, and that won’t change from a modification.

“If you’re already delinquent, your credit is already impacted,” said John Snyder, manager of foreclosure programs for NeighborWorks America.

But consumers who are making their mortgage payments are getting modifications, too, perhaps because wages were cut or jobs were lost. They may be struggling to stay current, but their credit may not be bad when they start a modification.

At Bank of America, consumers who are current on mortgage payments could show up as being delinquent in the bank’s system after a trial modification period begins because they’re paying less than the actual mortgage payment during that trial period.

At the end of the trial period, the bank said it brings its system up to date when the loan is converted to a permanent modification.

Some might argue that it’s not a wise move to take on more debt, such as a car loan, if a person saw a cut in pay and needed a home loan modification. But many consumers often cannot control when their car breaks down.

On top of that, lenders benefit from home loan modifications because potential foreclosures can be avoided.

Unknowingly though, many consumers discover themselves boxed in later when they try to get approved for credit.

“They’re concerned about the damage to their credit. They’re not happy about it,” said Bos.

“If you go out and try to purchase a car in two months, you could be denied,” she said.

Or you might have to get a co-signer or put down a bigger downpayment or accept a higher interest rate to get a loan.

What’s stranger is that not all home loan modifications will hit consumers in the same way on their credit reports.

Consumers who modify their mortgages under federal programs, such as the Making Home Affordable and the Home Affordable Modification Program, now can do so without hurting their credit scores since those modifications are listed as a “loan modified under a federal plan” as of Nov. 1.

Here’s the sticking point: If you are able to modify your loan through an individual bank or credit union’s program and not a government plan, it’s likely your credit score will be hurt.

To complicate matters further, eventually a “loan modified under a federal plan” on your credit report could hurt your score, too.

Ulzheimer noted that the only reason the new reporting guidelines do not damage your credit scores is because FICO, the company that created the FICO credit score, hasn’t had a chance to study the long-term predictive value of loan modifications to credit risk.

Still, homeowners who are in trouble must realize that a foreclosure or a short sale would be listed as a charge-off or settlement on a credit report and last seven years, Ulzheimer said, while a modification would typically last a few years.

If you do receive a loan modification, ask questions and be more careful about how you handle your credit elsewhere to try to combat any potential damage.

Before making any moves, talk to a nonprofit housing counselor. See www.findaforeclosurecounselor.org.

How to keep up your credit score

These days, a good score is around 720 points or higher. Here are some tips to help you maintain or improve your credit score:

• Do not apply for several credit cards. Applying for a store credit card could cut 10 points off the credit score of some consumers with good credit.

• Pay all bills on time – utilities, mortgage, credit cards, etc. Lenders customarily don’t report you as late to the credit bureaus until you have missed the original due date by at least 30 days. Being a month late with all payments, for example, might lower a credit score by from 60 to 110 points.

• Missing a payment on one account that wasn’t already late could slice 40 to 75 points from some credit scores.

• Keep your credit card balances low on all cards, much lower than half of the available limit on your credit cards. Maxing out can cut credit scores by 45 to 100 points.

• Negotiating a debt settlement with creditors can lower some credit scores by 45 to 125 points. A short sale on a home would be reported as a debt settlement.

• A loan modification to get a lower mortgage payment and stay in your home could impact your credit score. In some cases, consumers could see credit scores drop by 100 to 150 points.

• Having your home foreclosed on could knock 45 to 100 points off your credit score, depending on where your score started.

• Filing for bankruptcy will hurt some credit scores by 195 to 255 points.

© 2010 Detroit Free Press, Susan Tompor. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune News Service.


Posted by Fred Hintenberger on January 7th, 2010 8:15 AMPost a Comment (0)

Cash for Caulking
December 11th, 2009 1:07 PM
Obama proposes ‘Cash for Caulking’

WASHINGTON – Dec. 10, 2009 – President Obama proposed a program Tuesday that would reimburse homeowners for installing energy-efficient appliances, windows and insulation.

Under what has been dubbed “Cash for Caulking,” homeowners would get a 50 percent rebate on items like energy-efficient air conditioners, heating systems, washing machines and dryers, refrigerators, replacement windows, and insulation up to $12,000, meaning a household could spend $24,000 and get $12,000 back. There will likely be no income restrictions.

Steve Nadel, director at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, who is helping to craft the legislation, says they are contemplating having contractors or retailers pay part of the cost upfront to ease the need for homeowners to come up with lots of cash.

Source: CNNMoney.com (12/08/2009)

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on December 11th, 2009 1:07 PMPost a Comment (0)

More mortgage aid could be on the way
December 11th, 2009 1:06 PM
House Democrats are seeking to tap the government’s massive bailout fund to help homeowners who have lost their jobs and are struggling to make their mortgage payments.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) on Monday signed on to a proposal by Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) that would channel $3 billion from the federal Troubled Assets Relief Program toward mortgage relief for jobless Americans. The measure would designate another $1 billion for a program that gives grants to state and local governments to purchase foreclosed properties and use them for more productive purposes.

“The combination of unemployment and foreclosures may be the greatest threat to our economic recovery,” Waters said.

The proposal is one of more than 100 proposed amendments to a sweeping financial regulatory reform package scheduled for consideration in the full House this week.

In addition, Democratic lawmakers are planning to use the regulatory reform bill to revive a provision that would allow bankruptcy judges to modify a homeowner’s mortgage, including lowering the interest rate or cutting the principal owed. The provision passed the House earlier this year but is fiercely opposed by the financial services industry and was voted down in the Senate.

The renewed efforts come in the wake of recent complaints by the Congressional Black Caucus about the Obama administration’s handling of the economy. Caucus members, alarmed by the particularly harsh toll that foreclosures and unemployment have wrought on minority communities, have pushed in recent weeks to provide more tangible help to ailing homeowners. The caucus has held numerous meetings with White House officials and delayed a vote on the regulatory reform bill to draw attention to its concerns.

The Obama administration’s foreclosure prevention program, known as Making Home Affordable, has faced pressure recently because lenders have moved only a small percentage of borrowers from the initial trial phase to a permanent loan modification. Data to be released by the Treasury Department this week will show that about 6 percent of borrowers enrolled in the program so far have moved from trial modification to permanent adjustment, according to two industry officials.

Treasury officials called a meeting with industry leaders on the issue Monday as part of a campaign to address the challenges borrowers face in receiving permanent modifications, Michael S. Barr, a Treasury assistant secretary, said in a statement. Mortgage servicers “are on notice that they must ramp up and provide sustained relief to struggling homeowners now,” he said.

Industry officials say the small percentage reflects hundreds of thousands of borrowers who have not provided enough documentation to prove they are eligible for the program. But housing advocates argue that many homeowners remain in limbo even after submitting documents multiple times. Treasury is scheduled to release detailed data this week showing which lenders have completed the greatest number of modifications.

Mortgage industry officials, meanwhile, are less than thrilled that the so-called “cramdown” provision, which would allow judges to modify loans, might get a second chance in Congress.

“We continue to think it’s a bad idea, especially given the market of uncertainty” the country is in, said Steve O’Conner, a senior vice president at the Mortgage Bankers Association.

The measures proposed by Frank, Waters and others would become part of a wide-ranging bill to overhaul the nation’s fractured financial regulatory structure. Frank’s committee in recent months has approved a series of measures, including bills to establish oversight of the vast derivatives market and create an agency to regulate credit cards, mortgages and other consumer loans. The bills, which passed separately through the committee, will be bundled into one piece of legislation for consideration in the full House. Debate on the inclusive bill is scheduled to begin Wednesday, with a final vote by week’s end.

Copyright © 2009 www.washingtonpost.com

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on December 11th, 2009 1:06 PMPost a Comment (0)

Web site to help with loan modifications
December 11th, 2009 1:06 PM
The Obama Administration has introduced a comprehensive Financial Stability Plan to address the key problems at the heart of the current crisis and get our economy back on track. A critical piece of that effort is Making Home Affordable, a plan to stabilize our housing market and help up to 7 to 9 million Americans reduce their monthly mortgage payments to more affordable levels.

The Home Affordable Refinance Program gives up to 4 to 5 million homeowners with loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac an opportunity to refinance into more affordable monthly payments. The Home Affordable Modification Program commits $75 billion to keep up to 3 to 4 million Americans in their homes by preventing avoidable foreclosures.

The consumer website, www.MakingHomeAffordable.gov, provides homeowners with detailed information about these programs along with self-assessment tools and calculators to empower borrowers with the resources they need to determine whether they might be eligible for a modification or a refinance under the Administration's program. Through this website, borrowers can also connect with free counseling resources to help with outstanding questions; locate homeowner events in their communities; find a handy checklist of key documents and materials to have ready when making that important call to their servicer as well as FAQs from borrowers in similar circumstances; and much more.

We hope that you will find this website informative and useful as we all work together to solve our nation’s housing crisis and put our country on the path to a lasting economic recovery

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on December 11th, 2009 1:06 PMPost a Comment (0)

FHA looking to toughen lending standards
December 3rd, 2009 12:25 PM
FHA to toughen rules for borrowers

The Federal Housing Administration is proposing to increase the up-front cash paid by borrowers as part of an effort to shore up the agency’s finances, which have been staggered by rising defaults in its flagship mortgage insurance program, according to FHA officials.

The changes also include raising minimum credit scores for borrowers who receive FHA-backed mortgages and limiting the amount of money sellers can kick in, including paying closing costs or giving free upgrades.

These measures are designed to increase the amount borrowers invest in the homes they buy, thereby making it less attractive for them to default on loans and walk away from properties, as many people have done during the current housing crisis.

Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan is scheduled to announce the agency’s policy changes when he testifies Wednesday before the House Financial Services Committee.

The FHA has played a critical role in propping up the housing market by insuring lenders against default after the mortgage market unraveled. Currently, the agency backs about 30 percent of all loans for home purchases and 20 percent of refinancings. In the past, the FHA has resisted raising downpayments or insurance premiums for fear of shutting out qualified borrowers and stunting the housing market’s slow but steady recovery.

But Donovan plans to tell the House committee that the exploding volume of loans the FHA is now handling requires stricter risk controls than the previous administration had in place, according to a copy of his prepared testimony. A recent audit shows that the FHA’s financial cushion already has eroded below the level required by law.

“We’ve learned from recent history that the market is fragile, and we have to plan for the unexpected,” Donovan’s prepared statement says. “That uncertainty is complicated by an organization we inherited that, to be honest, was simply not properly managing or monitoring its risk.”

By requiring that borrowers bring more cash to the table, the agency is seeking to ensure they have “more skin in the game and a stronger equity position in their loans,” Donovan says. But he does not specify the size of the proposed increase. FHA officials said they have yet to determine how much cash will be required.

“There are several ways to accomplish this, and so we are currently analyzing various options to determine which is the most effective and consistent with our mission,” Donovan says.

Up-front cash can include downpayments as well as other payments. For now, FHA borrowers can put down as little as 3.5 percent, a level that many FHA critics say is too low. One lawmaker has introduced legislation that would boost the minimum downpayment to 5 percent.

As for seller concessions, the agency now allows sellers to kick in 6 percent of the home’s value. Donovan said he wants the maximum permissible level to be lowered to 3 percent, in line with industry norms.

Agency staff is reviewing whether to increase the monthly insurance premiums charged to borrowers, officials said. These payments come on top of insurance paid up front.

The current up-front premium is set at 1.75 percent of the value of the loan. FHA may decide that an increase in that premium is needed also, officials said.

To protect itself against the riskiest borrowers, the agency has decided “for the time being” to raise its minimum credit score requirements for new borrowers. Again, FHA staff is still analyzing what the new threshold should be, Donovan’s prepared testimony says.

The minimum credit score requirement is now so low – 500 out of a possible 850 – that it’s basically irrelevant. Many lenders that make FHA-insured loans impose much tougher restrictions. The concern is that if FHA does not toughen up, abusive lenders will get away with financing risky, poor credit borrowers already rejected by more reputable lenders.

Most of the new initiatives do not require congressional approval. Many have previously been suggested by critics and even supporters of the agency.

These measures are meant to build on other actions the FHA has taken to curb its risk and beef up its eroding cash reserves.

An audit released last month found that the agency’s cash reserves have shrunk to a level far below what is required by law, and the agency could need taxpayer funding if worst-case scenarios play out.

The audit, designed to measure the agency’s financial health, examined the excess cash the agency must set aside to deal with unexpected losses and found that those reserves were at about $3.6 billion as of Sept. 30, a drop from the $12.9 billion available a year earlier. The current total represents 0.53 percent of all outstanding single-family-home loans insured by the FHA, well below the 2 percent threshold set by law. This is the first time reserves have fallen under that level since 1994.

To stop the financial erosion, the FHA has focused in part on weeding out abusive lenders. This year, the agency has suspended business with seven lenders, including the now-defunct Taylor, Bean and Whitaker. It has withdrawn FHA-approval for 270 others, including Lend America. On its Web site Tuesday, Lend America said it has ceased its loan origination and operations, effective immediately.

The FHA is currently working on a new rule that would require banks it does business with to have up to $2.5 million in capital that they can use to repay the agency for losses if they were involved in fraud. Now, they are required to hold only $250,000.

On Wednesday, Donovan will ask Congress to grant the agency more authority to close down abusive lenders.

Copyright © 2009 www.washingtonpost.com

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on December 3rd, 2009 12:25 PMPost a Comment (0)

Foreign buyers are back in a big way
November 23rd, 2009 4:40 PM

The foreign buyers have returned in a big way and the buying momentum looks like it will continue to increase expedientially.

Wong, president of Optimus U.S. Real Estate Fund, has bought 60 condos at heavy discounts from developers in financial trouble. Wong paid about $62,500 each for 18 Las Vegas condos that once were priced at about $250,000 apiece.

“This could be a once-in-a-generation opportunity for real estate investment,” said Wong, whose Calgary, Alberta-based fund has already invested $5 million cash and will spend millions more in the U.S. Southwest over the next several months.

While foreign real estate investment in the first six months of 2009 was lower than last year’s level, real estate agents from New York to Las Vegas say purchases have increased rapidly in recent months.

Foreign investors have long been attracted to U.S. residential real estate, drawn by the market’s stability compared with other countries. But the dollar’s descent in the past six months has made makes homes even cheaper for foreigners, and prices are showing signs of stability.

International investors bought 154,000 homes and condos in the 12-month period ending in May, down nearly 10 percent from 170,000 for the same period a year earlier, the National Association of Realtors reports.

But since June, the dollar has tumbled by 9 to 11 percent against currencies like the Japanese yen, the European euro and the Canadian dollar. The Brazilian real has gained 17 percent against the dollar in the past six months.

Buyers from Brazil, Canada, France and the Netherlands, for example, have paid mostly cash for second homes ranging from $6 million to $15.5 million in condo buildings like 40 East 66th Street, a stone’s throw from Central Park and steps from shopping, restaurants and nightlife.

“(Foreign investors) love to have everything available to them once they walk out their front door,” said Barbara Russo, an agent with The Corcoran Group Real Estate in Manhattan.

Manhattan real estate agent Cynthia Crowley recently spoke with three different Israeli investors who have complained about rising real estate prices at home.

“They want to buy,” said Crowley, an agent with Olshan Realty in New York. “This is not tire kicking.”

Foreign investors love floor-level prices and the limp dollar but also are confident in a long-term recovery of the U.S. economy and the housing market’s resurgence. Some want vacation homes, while others are looking for rental income.

Buyers from Canada, India, the Middle East, Mexico, and Venezuela like Houston’s neighborhoods and its economy, which benefits from strong oil and health care industries.

“They also like to gravitate to where they have friends or family,” said Bill Gottfried, managing director of Gottfried International Estates.

Foreign investors often pay cash, or offer downpayments of 40 percent or more, because financing is difficult to get. Nearly half paid cash in the 12-month period ending in May, the Realtors group reports.

Florida leads the country in the amount of international buyers, accounting for nearly a quarter of foreign purchases. The Sunshine State was followed by three gateway states with warm climates - California, Texas, and Arizona.

Miami home prices are down by half from the peak period of late 2006 due to foreclosure sales and a glut of unsold units. With the dollar hitting a 15-month low this week against the euro, the bargains are enticing. Investors are buying single-family homes or condos for two-thirds the cost three years ago.

Peter Zalewski, a Miami-based real estate agent, said at least seven bulk deals involving foreign condo buyers have taken place in downtown Miami alone, with investors coming from Argentina, Canada, Colombia, Italy, Norway, and Venezuela. Similar deals also have taken place in heavily-populated Broward County and ritzy Palm Beach County.

Claudia Bacelar, an Esslinger Wooten Maxwell real estate agent, has seen more South Florida inquiries from Brazilian, Canadian and British buyers of second homes, many of whom gravitate to condos with great views in the $800,000 range. And they pay cash.

Argentina native Marco Bordoni bought a $860,000 house on a deepwater canal in the Golden Isles neighborhood last month. An importer-exporter of perfumes, he plans to spend half his time in South Florida on business.

Bordoni is spending $450,000 to remodel the house, which was valued at $1.2 million four years ago, said his agent, Scott Patterson.

“Prices fell enough that I could buy a property I would not be able to buy two years ago,” said Bordoni, 30.

Content from real estate blog with cedit giving to Adrian Sainz, real estate writer


Posted by Fred Hintenberger on November 23rd, 2009 4:40 PMPost a Comment (0)

Fl existing home sales up big
November 23rd, 2009 4:26 PM
Florida’s existing home, condo sales up in October 2009

ORLANDO, Fla. – Nov. 23, 2009 – Florida’s existing home sales rose in October, marking 14 months that sales activity has increased in the year-to-year comparison, according to the latest housing data released by Florida Realtors®. October’s statewide sales also increased over sales activity in September in both the existing home and existing condominium markets.

Existing home sales rose 45 percent last month with a total of 15,160 homes sold statewide compared to 10,444 homes sold in October 2008, according to Florida Realtors. Statewide existing home sales last month increased 5.1 percent over statewide sales activity in September.

Florida Realtors also reported an 82 percent increase in statewide sales of existing condos in October compared to the previous year’s sales figure; statewide existing condo sales last month rose 6.1 percent over the total units sold in September.

All of Florida’s metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) reported increased existing home sales and higher condo sales in October. A majority of the state’s MSAs have reported increased sales for 16 consecutive months.

Florida’s median sales price for existing homes last month was $140,300; a year ago, it was $169,700 for a 17 percent decrease. Housing industry analysts with the National Association of Realtors® (NAR) note that sales of foreclosures and other distressed properties continue to downwardly distort the median price because they generally sell at a discount relative to traditional homes. The median is the midpoint; half the homes sold for more, half for less.

The national median sales price for existing single-family homes in September 2009 was $174,900, down 8.1 percent from a year earlier, according to NAR. In California, the statewide median resales price was $296,090 in September; in Massachusetts, it was $290,000; in Maryland, it was $261,718; and in New York, it was $213,900.

According to NAR’s latest industry outlook, the housing market is continuing its positive momentum. “We’re getting early indications of price stabilization, but we need a steady supply of qualified buyers to meaningfully bring inventories down and return us to a period of normal, steady price growth,” said NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun. “That, in turn, would help fully remove consumer fears, which would then revive the broader economy.”

In Florida’s year-to-year comparison for condos, 5,398 units sold statewide last month compared to 2,958 units in October 2008 for an 82 percent increase. The statewide existing condo median sales price last month was $105,200; in October 2008 it was $147,900 for a 29 percent decrease. The national median existing condo price was $175,100 in September 2009, according to NAR.

Interest rates for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 4.95 percent last month, a significant drop from the average rate of 6.20 percent in October 2008, according to Freddie Mac. Florida Realtors’ sales figures reflect closings, which typically occur 30 to 90 days after sales contracts are written.

Among the state’s smaller markets, the Gainesville MSA reported a total of 172 homes sold in October compared to 130 homes a year earlier for a 32 percent increase. The market’s existing home median sales price last month was $156,700; a year ago it was $173,300 for a 10 percent decrease. A total of 22 condos sold in the MSA in October, up 22 percent over the 18 units sold in October 2008. The existing condo median price last month was $116,700; a year earlier, it was $133,300 for a 12 percent decrease.

Home inventories are also way down across the board.


Posted by Fred Hintenberger on November 23rd, 2009 4:26 PMPost a Comment (0)

Tax credit extends further for Armed Services
November 14th, 2009 12:53 PM
Homebuyer tax credit has added benefits for armed services

According to the National Association of Realtors@ (NAR), the recent homebuyer tax credit extension expands benefits for the U.S. military.

Armed service, intelligence service and foreign service personnel on active duty and out of the U.S. for 90 days during any part of 2009 get an additional year to buy their homes – to May 1, 20ll.

Another benefit is a waiver on the time of occupancy. Most homebuyers using the tax credit must use that home as a principal residence for a period of no fewer than three years or forfeit the entire credit. But military, intelligence and foreign service members do not have to repay the credit if they sell their home in less than three years if they move because of official business.

“NAR is the leading advocate for private property and homeownership issues, and firmly believes that those who are in service to their country should be full participants in the homebuyer tax credit law,” says NAR President Charles McMillan. “These men and women are often hindered by hardships from full participation in the American dream of homeownership because their duty disrupts them in the buying and selling of a home.” NAR was a main advocate for the homebuyer’s tax credit extension into 2010 and its expansion to include present homeowners.

Under the tax credit extension, eligible first-time homebuyers can get a tax credit up to $8,000. Current homeowners are eligible for a $6,500 tax credit, provided they have lived in the home they are selling, or have sold, as their principal residence for five consecutive years in the past eight years.

Income limits for eligible homebuyers are expanded to $125,000 for single buyers and $225,000 for couples. The purchase price of the home cannot exceed $800,000. To help guard against fraud, buyers are required to attach documentation of purchase to their tax return.

© 2009 Florida Realtors®

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on November 14th, 2009 12:53 PMPost a Comment (0)

Home buyer Tax Credit Extended
November 10th, 2009 9:46 PM
Obama signs bill: Homebuyer tax credit program extended

WASHINGTON – Nov. 6, 2009 – President Obama signed H.R. 3548 this morning, enacting into law an extension, and adjustment, of the $8,000 tax credit for first-time buyers. Among other things, the extension adds money for certain move-up buyers; creates one deadline for signing a contract and a later deadline for closing; changes income requirements; and limits a purchased home’s cost to $800,000.

“Extending the homebuyer tax credit and expanding it to reach more homebuyers is the right thing to do,” says 2009 Florida Realtors® President Cynthia Shelton. “It is critical to maintaining the positive momentum we’ve been experiencing in the housing market and in the overall economy. Florida Realtors applaud congressional leaders for taking action to extend the homebuyer tax credit into 2010, which will help Florida families realize their dream of homeownership, improve our communities and strengthen our economy.”

Adds John Sebree, Florida Realtors vice president of public policy, “Florida residents enjoy two additional advantages. The Florida Homebuyer Opportunity Program (FHOP), created by the Florida Legislature earlier this year, still has approximately $28 million that first-time homebuyers can access and use toward their downpayment. And move-up buyers now have the ability to ‘port’ their current property tax savings to a new home.”

First-time homebuyers

Most details for first-time homebuyers mirror the rules currently in existence. The maximum tax credit remains $8,000 ($4,000 for married individuals filing separately), and anyone who has not owned a home within three years is considered a “first-time buyer.”

• A purchase must be under contract by April 30, 2010.

• A purchase under contract by April 30 must close no later than June 30, 2010.

• After Dec. 1, 2009, income limits rise to $125,000 for singles and $225,000 for married couples; up from limits effective through Nov. 30 of $75,000 for singles and $150,000 for married couples. The tax credit phases out incrementally at each $20,000 increase in income.

• Effective immediately: The maximum home value purchased cannot exceed $800,000. Prior to the law being signed, first-time homebuyers had no limitation on a home’s cost.

Current homeowner tax credit

An existing homeowner who purchases a home may now claim a tax credit of up to $6,500. To qualify, that owner must have owned and used the same residence as a principal residence for any consecutive five-year period in the previous eight years.

• This new tax credit is effective immediately. Eligible homebuyers do not have to wait until Dec. 1 to close in order to qualify.

• Personal income limits, maximum home value, and contract/closing deadlines are the same as those for first-time homebuyers.

Long-time Florida homeowners who enjoy discounted property taxes resulting from the state’s Save Our Homes amendment qualify for property tax portability, notes Sebree. For more information or to calculate how much tax savings can be transferred to a new home, visit floridarealtors.org at: http://www.floridarealtors.org/LegislativeCenter/TopInitiatives/index.cfm

Florida Homebuyer Opportunity Program

Under FHOP, first-time Florida homebuyers can obtain interest-free bridge loans to access their federal tax credit before they complete a home purchase, enabling them to use that money upfront for downpayment and closing costs. Once buyers submit their returns to the IRS and receive their tax credit money, they repay their loans to the state.

The Florida Realtors-backed program came out of the 2009 session of the Florida Legislature. However, as part of the 2009-2010 budget year, did not become effective immediately. They tax credit extension will allow many first-time buyers to tap into the approximately $28 million in the program's remaining funds.

While funded by the state, the money is distributed through the city and county housing offices that operate the State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) program. There is no standardized program, and each local agency may operate under different rules for distribution. For more information, buyers should contact their local SHIP office.

To find a local SHIP office, go to: http://apps.floridahousing.org/StandAlone/FHFC_ECM/AppPage_SHIPLGContacts.aspx.

Additional changes

The tax credit extension includes other new rules, such as:

• The new law also impacts dependent purchases of homes, which weren’t addressed under the old rules.

• The new law requires a buyer to attach documentation about the home purchase to his or her income tax return. An audit found that some buyers are claiming the tax credit when they don’t deserve it, and investigators continue to seek out fraud. To minimize tax abuse going forward, buyers won’t receive the credit without submitting proof to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

The homebuyer tax credit is collected as part of the normal income tax process. As a credit, it’s calculated separately from an individual’s income tax, and paid regardless of taxes owed or withheld from income. As always, however, only a tax planner can render specific advice to anyone seeking the credit. For more information on the credit, contact a tax planner or visit the IRS website at: http://www.irs.gov.

Florida Realtors will update tax credit information and clarify details when available on the Homebuyer Center, part of floridarealtors.org at: http://www.floridarealtors.org/AboutFar/homebuyercenter/index.cfm.

Cynthia Shelton, 2009 Florida Realtors® president, shares the great news about the newly extended and expanded homebuyers tax-credit program.


Posted by Fred Hintenberger on November 10th, 2009 9:46 PMPost a Comment (0)

Florida existing home sales up for September
October 24th, 2009 12:21 PM

Florida’s existing home, condo sales up in September 2009


ORLANDO, Fla. – Oct. 23, 2009 – Florida’s existing home sales rose in September, which marks more than a year (13 months) that sales activity has increased in the year-to-year comparison, according to the latest housing data released by Florida Realtors®. September’s statewide sales also increased over sales activity in August in both the existing home and existing condominium markets.

Existing home sales rose 34 percent last month with a total of 14,419 homes sold statewide compared to 10,778 homes sold in September 2008, according to Florida Realtors. Statewide existing home sales last month increased 4.1 percent over statewide sales activity in August.

Florida Realtors also reported a 77 percent increase in statewide sales of existing condos in September compared to the previous year’s sales figure; statewide existing condo sales last month rose 8.9 percent over the total units sold in August.

All of Florida’s metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) reported increased existing home sales in September; all but one MSA also showed a gain in condo sales. A majority of the state’s MSAs have reported increased sales for 15 consecutive months.

Florida’s median sales price for existing homes last month was $142,000; a year ago, it was $174,900 for a 19 percent decrease. Housing industry analysts with the National Association of Realtors® (NAR) note that sales of foreclosures and other distressed properties continue to downwardly distort the median price because they generally sell at a discount relative to traditional homes. The median is the midpoint; half the homes sold for more, half for less.

The national median sales price for existing single-family homes in August 2009 was $177,500, down 12.1 percent from a year earlier, according to NAR. In Massachusetts, the statewide median resales price was $315,000 in August; in California, it was $292,960; in Maryland, it was $265,862; and in New York, it was $205,000.

NAR’s latest industry outlook notes positive signs in the housing sector, but adds that extension of the federal first-time homebuyer tax credit would help sustain a fragile recovery. “Now that the market is showing some momentum, we have an opportunity to achieve a more rapid and broader stabilization in home prices,” said NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun. The outlook for home sales and prices depends on whether the tax credit is extended, he said, describing it as “the best tool in our arsenal to encourage financially qualified buyers to stimulate the economy and help reduce the budget deficit.”

In Florida’s year-to-year comparison for condos, 5,088 units sold statewide last month compared to 2,870 units in September 2008 for a 77 percent increase. The statewide existing condo median sales price last month was $102,500; in September 2008 it was $153,500 for a 33 percent decrease. The national median existing condo price was $179,300 in August 2009, according to NAR.

Interest rates for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 5.06 percent last month, a significant drop from the average rate of 6.04 percent in September 2008, according to Freddie Mac. FAR’s sales figures reflect closings, which typically occur 30 to 90 days after sales contracts are written.

Among the state’s smaller markets, the Pensacola MSA reported a total of 275 homes sold in September compared to 267 homes a year earlier for a 3 percent increase. The market’s existing home median sales price last month was $135,000; a year ago it was $146,900 for an 8 percent decrease. A total of 48 condos sold in the MSA in September, up 41 percent over the 34 units sold in September 2008. The existing condo median price last month was $190,000; a year earlier, it was $180,000 for a 6 percent gain.

Big rebound in existing-home sales shows first-time buyer momentum. Read more.

© 2009 Florida Realtors®


Posted by Fred Hintenberger on October 24th, 2009 12:21 PMPost a Comment (0)

Property Tax Appeal Fee Could Increase
October 24th, 2009 12:13 PM

Attention Homeowners: Property tax appeal fee could triple!

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Oct. 22, 2009 – Fighting property taxes would cost more under a push to more than triple filing fees imposed on taxpayers appealing their tax bills.

Property owners statewide can now pay $15 to appeal their tax assessments. Palm Beach County officials are calling for the Legislature to increase that statewide fee to $50.

This comes as more South Florida property owners are filing appeals to try to reduce what they owe in property taxes amid an economic recession.

The $15 fee isn’t enough to cover processing costs to consider appeals, according to Palm Beach County’s Value Adjustment Board.

Palm Beach County contends it costs about $43 per application to cover appeal costs that include holding a hearing with an independent magistrate who serves as a mediator.

Linda Phillips, supervisor of the Broward County Value Adjustment Board, said that her agency hasn’t calculated actual cost of processing tax appeals, but she knows it’s more than $15.

With the number of appeals increasing, the Legislature should boost the fee to $50, said Palm Beach County Commissioner Karen Marcus, who heads the county’s value adjustment aboard.

“People should be willing to pay what it costs to process,” Marcus said. “The rest of the taxpayers are going to have to subsidize them.”

The fee has been around for at least 20 years, Phillips said.

“We found a 1989 resolution that it was $15,” Phillips said. “It’s been $15 for a long time. It has not gone up.”

Meanwhile appeals have steadily increased over the last 15 years or so.

Appeals of property values used for tax assessments are increasing as more people grow frustrated that their property tax payments are staying the same or rising, even though their property values are dropping.

South Florida county property appraisers say their estimated property values are going down, but that property tax bills may remain the same or go up because of rising tax rates set by local governments as well as the differing effects of the state’s homestead exemption.

Appeals hit record numbers this year in Palm Beach County, which saw a 40 percent increase with 18,325 taxpayers filing to challenge their 2009 assessments.

In Broward County, the appeals increased 9 percent, to 32,411.

Miami-Dade County has yet to finish counting the appeals filed as of the September deadline. As of last week, about 69,000 petitions have been entered into Miami-Dade’s appeals system and the total is projected to far exceed the 70,000 filed last year.

Before raising the cost to file appeals, state legislators and local officials should look for ways to cut costs, said Robert Weissert, spokesman for Florida Tax Watch – a nonpartisan Tallahassee-based research group.

Too many times, state and local governments increase fees to help cover other expenses, Weissert said.

“We are seeing these fees raised more than necessary,” Weissert said. “It is absolutely vital that the citizens have an opportunity to challenge their property taxes.”

State legislators last spring resisted calls to boost property tax appeal filing fees, even as they changed state law to make the appeals process more taxpayer friendly.

In the past, county property appraisers benefited from a “presumption of correctness” that put the burden on taxpayers to prove that an assessment was wrong. Now county property appraisers have to go further to defend how they arrived at their numbers.

Changes to state law also now allow more leeway for property owners to file appeals late, if they can prove that an extraordinary circumstance, such as illness, delayed their application.

 

Copyright © 2009 Sun Sentinel, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., Andy Reid. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. Staff Writer Brian Haas contributed to this report.


Posted by Fred Hintenberger on October 24th, 2009 12:13 PMPost a Comment (0)

8K Q&A
October 23rd, 2009 12:35 PM
Understanding the homebuyer tax credit

THE PROCESS & THE BASICS

Q. What is the new tax incentive?

A. The 2008 $7,500, repayable credit increased to $8,000 and the repayment feature was eliminated for 2009

purchasers. Any home purchased for $80,000 or more qualifies for the full $8,000 amount. If the house

costs less than $80,000, the credit is 10% of the cost. It is available for the purchase of a principal residence

on or after Jan. 1, 2009, and before Dec. 1, 2009.

Q. Who is eligible?

A. Only first-time homebuyers are eligible – those who have not had any ownership interest in a home in the

three years previous to the day of the 2009 purchase.

Q. How does a tax credit work?

A. Every dollar of a tax credit reduces income taxes by a dollar. Credits are claimed on an individual’s income

tax return. A qualified purchaser figures out their total tax owed and then the tax credits are applied to

reduce the total tax bill, i.e. if a person has a total tax liability of $9,500, an $8,000 credit would wipe out all

but $1,500 of the tax due.

Q. So what happens if the purchaser is eligible for an $8,000 credit but their entire income tax

liability for the year is only $6,000?

A. If the total tax liability before calculating the credit was $6,000, the IRS would send the purchaser a check

for $2,000. The refundable amount is the difference between the $8,000 credit amount and the amount of

tax liability, determined by tables the IRS prepares each year.

Q. Is there an income restriction?

A. Yes. The income restriction is based on the tax filing status the purchaser claims when filing his/her income

tax return. Individuals filing as Single (or Head of Household) are eligible for the credit if their income is no

more than $75,000. Married couples who file a joint return may have income of no more than $150,000.

Q. Do individuals with higher incomes lose all the benefit of the credit?

A. Not always. The credit phases out between $75,000 - $95,000 for singles and $150,000 - $170,000 for

married filing jointly. The closer a buyer comes to the maximum phase-out amount, the smaller the credit

will be. The law provides a formula to gradually withdraw the credit.

Q. How is “principal residence” defined?

A. A principal residence is where an individual spends most of his/her time (generally defined as more than

50%). Also defined as “owner-occupied” housing, it includes single-family detached housing, condos or coops,

townhouses or any similar type of new or existing dwelling.

Q. Do I have to repay the 2009 tax credit?

A. There is no repayment.

Q. How do I apply for the credit?

A. All eligible purchasers simply claim the credit on their IRS Form 1040 tax return. The credit will be reflected

on a new Form 5405 that will be attached to the 1040. Form 5405 can be found at www.irs.gov.

Q. Can I use it as part of my downpayment?

A. No. Congress tried hard to devise a mechanism that would make the funds available for closing costs, but

found that pre-funding would require cumbersome processes that would, in effect, bring the IRS into the

purchase and settlement phase of the transaction. However, Florida recently adopted a $30.1 million budget

for its Florida Homebuyer Opportunity Program, which will help with downpayment assistance for those

who qualify for the federal $8,000 first-time homebuyer tax credit.

MAKING IT WORK

Q. What if I can’t settle before Dec. 1?

A. The credit is available for purchases before Dec. 1, 2009. A home is considered as “purchased” when all

events have occurred that transfer the title from the seller to the new purchaser. Closings must occur before

Dec. 1, 2009 for purchases to be eligible.

Q. Do I have to wait until next year to get the credit?

A. Eligible homebuyers who make their purchase between Jan. 1, 2009 and Dec. 1, 2009 can treat the purchase

as if it had occurred on Dec. 31, 2008. Thus, they can claim the credit on their 2008 tax return that was due on

April 15, 2009. Filing options include:

1. If you received an extension on your 2008 income tax return, you can still claim the credit as late

as Oct. 15, 2009.

2. If you have already filed your 2008 return before the purchase of a home, file an amended 2008 tax

return on Form 1040X. (Available at www.irs.gov).

3. If you plan to claim the credit on your 2009 tax return, you can modify your income tax withholding

(through employers) or adjust your quarterly estimated tax payments. Individuals subject to income tax

withholding would get an IRS Form W-4 from their employer. In many cases their withholding would

decrease and their take-home pay would increase. Those who make estimated tax payments would make

similar adjustments.

Q. Will I ever have to repay the credit?

A. If you claim the credit but then sell the property within three years of the date of purchase, you are required

to pay back the full amount of any credit, including any refund you received from it. A few exceptions apply.


Posted by Fred Hintenberger on October 23rd, 2009 12:35 PMPost a Comment (0)

Firms that are creating a bigger mortgage mess are getting billions of tax payers dollars
October 6th, 2009 9:16 PM
Firms are getting billions, yet aren’t averting foreclosures 
The federal government is engaged in a massive mortgage modification program that’s on track to send billions in tax dollars to many of the very companies that judges or regulators have cited in recent years for abusive mortgage practices.

The firms, called mortgage servicers, have been cited for badgering, manipulating or lying to their customers, sticking them with bogus fees, or improperly foreclosing on them.

Mortgage servicers are the middlemen between homeowners and the investors that hold their mortgages, collect homeowners’ checks and disburse payments for the mortgages, property tax and insurance. They’re a necessary player for any modification.

The reliance on such companies points to an ironic paradox for federal regulators: Cleaning up the nation’s financial crisis often rewards the firms that helped create the mess. Those Wall Street banks and mortgage servicing companies argue that they’re best positioned to repair the damage they’ve helped cause. In the case of the mortgage program, the firms getting the taxpayers’ money are, after all, the firms that control the troubled mortgages.

To make matters worse, the Government Accountability Office, Congress’ watchdog, has said that the Treasury Department hasn’t done enough to oversee the companies participating in what’s known as the Home Affordable Modification Program, which emerged from the bank bailout bill Congress passed last fall.

The modification program has been slow to get off the ground. Since it began this spring, only 12 percent of a potential 3 million delinquent mortgages have begun the process of being reworked, or put into “a trial modification,” according to Treasury Department data through August, the most recent available.

“We’ve consistently been behind this problem,” said Mark Pearce, North Carolina’s chief deputy commissioner of banks, who works with a state-level group of attorneys general from across the country. “Two years ago, maybe some were caught by surprise. But we still haven’t gotten to a point where the servicers have demonstrated an ability to handle the problem.”

Housing advocates say homeowners still face “reluctant lenders,” said Irwin Trauss, an attorney who represents low-income homeowners for Philadelphia Legal Assistance. He recently testified at a hearing of the Congressional Oversight Panel, the watchdog that monitors the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, better known as TARP, or the bank bailout bill.

Trauss said that Bank of America, at least through July, told homeowners that they couldn’t participate in the program when they should’ve been allowed to do so, and he alleges that Saxon Mortgage forced one of his clients into bankruptcy without providing a valid reason for turning down her modification request. Trauss’ comments were echoed by other housing advocates, who’ve found mortgage servicers slow to respond and confused about modification rules.

“Servicers look for reasons to avoid making the modifications when they are most needed, rather than for opportunities to make them,” Trauss said.

Saxon Mortgage said it couldn’t comment on Trauss’ testimony because it wasn’t provided with specific details of the account in question. Bank of America said there could have been instances in which improperly trained employees were confused about the modification rules, but the vast majority of customers have been given proper information.

Although it’s early in the Treasury Department’s program, housing advocates say the servicer industry for years has resisted helping customers with modifications. Donna and Ronnie Fruia, of Troutman, N.C., learned firsthand how difficult it can be.

The couple was in the midst of a series of health crises, and three members of the family – the couple’s son, Donna’s mother and Ronnie – were in the hospital.

It was then that Donna got an urgent call that somebody from her mortgage company, CitiFinancial, had just showed up in her husband’s hospital room, where he was recovering from a stroke.

“They said, ‘Some guy’s in there aggravating him,’ “ she said.

“At the time, I couldn’t even really talk that good,” Ronnie said. “But he wanted me to sign a bunch of papers.”

The Fruias had been trying to get a mortgage modification from CitiFinancial. The company, however, was pushing the Fruias to accept a modification that wouldn’t have cut their interest rate, they said.

Only after the episode in the hospital room and the involvement of state regulators did CitiFinancial cut the mortgage’s interest rate from 11.5 percent to 5 percent, lowering their monthly payment from $985 to $602. The process took from the start of the year until July.

“They were the perfect candidate for someone with a subprime rate getting a modification,” said Henrietta Thompson, who as housing coordinator for United Family Services, a United Way-funded organization in Charlotte, helped the Fruias. “I know if the banking commissioner hadn’t gotten involved, it wouldn’t have happened.”

While CitiFinancial, a unit of Citigroup Inc. – one of the largest recipients of TARP bailout funds – said it couldn’t talk about specific customers, it’s “pleased” that the case was resolved.

“We have strict guidelines concerning the behavior of our representatives, and the incident you described would not be acceptable under our policies, even if well-intentioned,” said Mark Rodgers, a spokesman.

It shouldn’t have been a surprise that the mortgage service companies would have trouble executing wide-scale mortgage modifications. They generally aren’t set up for the complicated business of reworking loans.

In 2007, an assistant attorney general in Iowa, Patrick Madigan, analyzed the looming mortgage meltdown and found that mortgage service companies have a “highly automated process, spending as little time as possible on an individual loan and preferably no time actually talking to the customer.”

“Loan modifications, by contrast, are a time-intensive process that requires a great deal of individualized attention,” he wrote. “In some situations, it may be easier and cheaper for a servicer to simply foreclose on a borrower than to try to fix the underlying problem.”

Service companies had high turnover and employees who saw their jobs as akin to that of collection agents. Some were known to hang up on callers if they started to get tough questions, Madigan wrote. He urged mortgage service companies to hire far more staff and boost training.

That year, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller convened a group of state officials (Iowa’s Madigan helped coordinate the effort), who then contacted the nation’s 20 largest servicers of risky subprime mortgages.

By September 2008, however, as the economy went into free fall, the mortgage industry’s efforts had been “profoundly disappointing.”

“Too many homeowners face foreclosure without receiving any meaningful assistance by their mortgage servicer, a reality that is growing worse rather than better,” said a report from the State Foreclosure Prevention Working Group.

By this year, more federal and private efforts were under way to modify millions of troubled mortgages, and customer service was beginning to improve. Companies, though, were still having trouble getting the job done.

“It is difficult for homeowners to initiate productive discussions with lenders because many servicers lack the capacity to deal with a large volume of modifications,” the Congressional Oversight Panel reported. “Servicers are generally understaffed for handling a large volume of consumer loan workouts.”

The panel found that it’s “unlikely” that mortgage servicers will be able to do all they’re being asked to do: “Servicers are simply in the wrong line of business for doing modifications en masse,” it said.

Madigan, the assistant Iowa attorney general, said in an interview that “the mortgage industry has responded to this crisis with a series of half steps based on a notion that a turnaround in the housing market was just around the corner.”

Under the Treasury Department’s mortgage modification program, three parties can participate: the company that owns the loan, the company that services the loan, and the homeowner. All get a portion of the more than $20 billion that the federal government currently estimates it could spend to keep homes out of foreclosure.

While the Treasury said it’s necessary to take in as many mortgage service companies as possible, the GAO found that the department wasn’t doing enough to monitor the process.

In a July report, the GAO said that the department had “significant gaps in its oversight structure,” and was short-staffed in the office monitoring the modification program. As of July – eight months into the program – the Treasury had filled fewer than half the positions in a key modification office. (Many of those jobs have since been filled, the department said.)

Beyond that, the government had conducted “readiness reviews” of only seven of 27 mortgage servicers the GAO examined; no more were planned. The reviews only included interviews with senior executives – and the information gathered wasn’t verified.

“Treasury cannot identify, assess and address risks associated with servicers that lack the capacity to fulfill all program requirements,” the GAO said.

Treasury said it’s beefing up its review procedures and also said it recognizes many of the problems and has been working to correct them. “Clearly, we’re not there yet,” said Seth Wheeler, one of the Treasury officials who oversees the modification effort. “Clearly there’s still inconsistent application of the program, even though we have made progress.”

Several companies in the Treasury program have been cited by judges or regulators for engaging in improper behavior with their customers.

They include Select Portfolio Servicing Inc., a Utah-based company formerly known as Fairbanks Capital Corp.; Countrywide Home Loan Servicing, now a unit of Bank of America Corp.; Carrington Mortgage Services LLC, based in California; Saxon Mortgage Services Inc., a unit of Morgan Stanley; EMC Mortgage Corp., now a subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co.; and Green Tree Servicing, a Minnesota company.

Ocwen Financial Corp., a Florida-based company that services more than 300,000 mortgages nationwide, could receive more than $200 million in TARP payments.

“Ocwen has screwed up my finances so bad you can’t believe it,” said Brad Rhoton, whose rental properties in the Houston suburbs are part of a nationwide lawsuit against Ocwen. “It’s been the most maddening process you can imagine.”

Rhoton’s lawsuit charges that Ocwen constantly misapplied Rhoton’s mortgage payments and tacked on unnecessary fees and insurance, causing his accounts to fall behind.

So far under the Treasury’s modification program, Ocwen has started trial modifications in 8 percent of potential mortgages – below the national average and well below some other servicers.

Paul Koches, a company spokesman, said the number is misleadingly low. Ocwen, he said, has set rigorous standards in documenting its modifications and is therefore likely to have a far higher share of its modifications stick than other companies. He said that Ocwen undertook its own loan modification program in 2007 and has beefed up its staff substantially since then.

As for the suits against it, Koches said they represent a fraction of the firm’s customer base, and many were copycat lawsuits that tried to paint Ocwen with the same brush as other mortgage servicer firms. He said the company continues to vigorously defend itself against lawsuits.

Over the years, Ocwen has lost other lawsuits and has been slapped down by a federal judge for its conduct.

In one Texas bankruptcy case, for example, a federal judge blasted Ocwen after it tried to pass the cost of a $1,000 sanction onto the customer it was cited for mistreating. When the judge found out, he said, “Ocwen’s course of conduct in this proceeding bordered on the outrageous.” He fined the company an additional $27,500.

The case was far from isolated, however. A jury in Galveston, Texas, ordered the company to pay $11.5 million, and one down the coast in Corpus Christi ordered it to pay $3 million for unfairly foreclosing on homeowners (both cases were then settled in the appeals process for undisclosed amounts).

In both cases, the plaintiffs were on the edge financially, and so when Ocwen added extra fees to their accounts, they quickly fell behind.

That was part of their strategy, plaintiffs’ attorneys said. One of the key witnesses before both juries was a former Ocwen account officer who said the company trained its sights on customers who had substantial equity in their homes. In those cases, the company had the most to gain if customers lost their homes in foreclosure.

“We didn’t treat the people very well, but the money was pretty good,” the former account officer, Ron Davis, testified during one of the trials. (Davis couldn’t be reached for further comment.)

The motive, he said, was simple: force people into foreclosure as a way to earn higher bonuses.

“We would call the customers and ask them what bridge they were going to live under,” Davis testified.

Ocwen lost that lawsuit. A Texas jury found that the company engaged in “fraudulent, deceptive, or misleading” tactics that it called “unconscionable.” The case involved an elderly Texas woman the bank tried to evict from her home even after a local judge had ordered it not to. The jury awarded her $11.5 million, which was reduced to $1.8 million, according to Ocwen’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings; the case was settled during appeals.

Outside the courts, federal regulators in 2004 approached Ocwen to request that the company enter into a formal supervisory agreement under which it promised to improve its customer service. It required, for example, that Ocwen beef up its ombudsman to take customer complaints; adopt a “borrower-oriented customer service commitment plan”; take reasonable actions to see if homeowners already have hazard insurance before adding it to customers’ accounts; and regularly report to federal regulators about outstanding customer complaints.

Koches of Ocwen said the agreement was merely an attempt to formalize many of the steps the company was already taking – and that the company and federal regulators wanted to avoid the kind of problems other firms had experienced.

Later that year, however, Ocwen took steps to ensure that such regulatory findings wouldn’t come again.

By successfully petitioning to have itself removed from the oversight of the Office of Thrift Supervision, the supervisory agreement hatched just months before was ended, according to Ocwen’s regulatory filings. Ocwen said it removed itself from OTS oversight for business reasons unrelated to the supervisory agreement and that it continues to follow the intent of the agreement.

© 2009 McClatchy-Tribune Information Services, Chris Adams. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune News Service.

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on October 6th, 2009 9:16 PMPost a Comment (0)

Freddie Mac to help home owners
October 5th, 2009 10:28 PM
 Freddie Mac, a government sponsored enterprise (GSE), has hired a private vendor to promote mortgage modifications to homeowners who have missed payments but aren’t responding to mail or phone calls. The vendor, Titanium Solutions Inc., will meet with delinquent borrowers at their homes to help them supply missing information, documents and complete other actions to qualify them for a three-month trial payment period under Freddie Mac’s under President Obama’s Making Home Affordable program.

Titanium will also help borrowers who have started trial periods to complete the documentation needed to convert into final modifications.

“By meeting with our borrowers one on one, in their homes, Titanium Solutions can help them overcome the roadblocks keeping them from starting their Home Affordable Modification trial periods,” sys Ingrid Beckles, senior vice president of default asset management at Freddie Mac. “We believe this can give borrowers seeking Home Affordable Modifications the same type of personalized guidance they may have had when they were buying their home or applying for their mortgage.”

To minimize fraud, Titanium Solutions representatives will not accept mortgage payments or any other money from borrowers. Representatives will also carry a copy of the servicers’ solicitation letter the borrower initially received. The letters are uniquely formatted and include unique information about the mortgage loan.
 
For more information about Freddie Mac efforts to help borrowers and support Making Home Affordable, visit http://freddiemac.com/avoidforeclosure

Congress established Freddie Mac in 1970 to provide liquidity, stability and affordability to the nation’s residential mortgage markets. Freddie Mac supports communities across the nation by providing mortgage capital to lenders. Over the years, Freddie Mac has made home possible for one in six homebuyers and more than five million renters.

© 2009 Florida Realtors®

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on October 5th, 2009 10:28 PMPost a Comment (0)

Florida ranks high for low business taxes
September 24th, 2009 10:30 PM
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Sept. 24, 2009 – Florida remains among the top 10 states in the nation when it comes to “business friendly” taxes, but one leading lawmaker says the high ranking means little if the Sunshine State doesn’t do a better job attracting new companies.

Florida ranked 5th in the 2010 State Business Tax Climate report put out this week by the Washington D.C.-based Tax Foundation. Florida has had the best ranking among Southern states for several years, based largely on a state constitution that prohibits an income tax.

The conservative-leaning Tax Foundation also looked at property taxes, unemployment taxes, corporate income taxes and sales taxes. Even though they included Florida’s now higher cigarette tax in overall sales taxes, it did not change the overall ranking.

Natasha Altamirano, a spokeswoman for the foundation, stressed that the rankings don’t reflect how much money the taxes raise, but how broad and competitive the structure is compared to other states. In fact, the report faults Florida for some of the economic incentives is uses to attract businesses, pointing to the decision by Capital One to close a Tampa-area facility in 2004 even though it received state tax breaks. According to the report, it’s more effective approach to improve business taxes for the long term.

State Sen. Don Gaetz, R-Niceville, and chairman of a Senate select committee on Florida’s economy, isn’t impressed much by the high ranking, which comes at a time when the state has nearly 1 million people out of work.

“I’m less interested in whether we are 5 or 7 in the ranking of a Washington organization,’’ said Gaetz. “I’m more concerned with what we are doing to bring jobs to Florida and keeping jobs in Florida.’’

The state’s stubbornly high unemployment rate could prompt changes to Florida’s ongoing economic development programs. The Senate Commerce committee is already working on a review of the state’s Qualified Target Tax Industry (QTI) tax refund program, which sunsets on June 30, 2010, unless lawmakers reenact the program. First started in 1994, the program is supposed to target high-wage businesses that either expand existing operations or relocate to Florida.

Gaetz said the select committee is analyzing the nation’s top 10 job-creation states to see if they have programs that Florida should enact. He sees a “significant gap” between those states and Florida, and notes that most of Florida’s economic development programs were designed before the state became a boom state.

“In my view, we have to look hard at our tax policy and other economic policies to make sure we are relevant,’’ said Gaetz, who wants his select committee to come up with a “Jobs for Florida” package in time for the 2010 session.

While the Tax Foundation ranked Florida fifth overall on business tax issues, it ranked the state first on individual income taxes, 15th on corporate income taxes, 32nd on sales taxes, third on unemployment insurance taxes and 22nd in the nation on property taxes.

Source: News Service of Florida, Gary Fineout.

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on September 24th, 2009 10:30 PMPost a Comment (1)

Short sale frustrations
September 24th, 2009 10:28 PM

A few years ago, few people in the housing market had ever heard of a short sale.

Mention the term today and people, whether they are homeowners or real estate agents, just roll their eyes.

The Tampabay Business Journal statistics show that less than 10% of short sales even make it to the closing table in the Tampabay area.

The practice, which involves selling a property for less than the amount owed on the mortgage, has grown in popularity as an exit strategy for financially strapped homeowners because it doesn’t ding a credit report as deeply as a foreclosure. But because the transactions have to be approved by first and second lien holders, they are languishing. Some real estate agents try to steer clear of them entirely and even specify in their listings that a property is not a short sale.

The Obama administration is aware of the frustrations. In mid-May, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner announced plans to streamline the process by offering financial incentives to mortgage servicers and investors that accept short sales, much in the same way that they are rewarded for refinancing or modifying troubled mortgages.

Four months later, homeowners, real estate agents and lenders are still waiting for specific details of how the plan would work. A Treasury Department spokeswoman said an update on the program is expected in a few weeks.

Meanwhile, homeowners like Dallas O’Day are in limbo.

O’Day, a Chicago attorney, and his family relocated from California in June 2004 and bought a Mediterranean-style home in Chicago’s Beverly neighborhood for $395,000. They rewired the house, stripped and refinished the wood floors and the woodwork and did other work to restore its charm.

Last year, personal circumstances prompted them to list the home for sale just as the housing industry’s meltdown was picking up steam. With no takers and no longer even expecting to break even on his investment, O’Day relisted the 2,700-square-foot home in January as a short sale.

Four months and three price reductions brought the house down to $384,900, at which point a potential buyer made an offer in late May. O’Day accepted it and submitted the paperwork to the lenders holding first and second mortgages on the home.

He has yet to receive a response. Meanwhile, the family has moved into a North Side apartment, the refrigerator has broken in the home and there’s evidence of mold in the basement.

“The only thing we keep hearing is they keep wanting current payroll stubs, bank statements and taxes,” said O’Day’s real estate agent, Pam Decker at Prudential Biros Real Estate in Evergreen Park.

“What has astonished me is that in the presence of one of the softest housing markets I can remember, we’re hitting up on four months and they’ve just had a person assigned to look at it, that they would move at such a glacial pace,” O’Day said. “My expectation is I’ll be renting until whatever blemish is gone. I’ve just accepted the fact that at some point it’ll be foreclosed upon because I just don’t think the banks will pull it together. I feel like I’ve done everything I can do.”

During the second quarter, 14 percent of all home sales were short sales and they were made primarily to first-time buyers who may have more flexibility to deal with the long wait times, according to a survey by Campbell Communications. The sales volume could be much greater. Two out of three short sales never close.

“In general, you have to have three offers for every completed short sale,” said survey designer Thomas Popik. “The first offer, the buyer walks before they get a yes or no. On the second offer they walk a good part of the time. The third offer is the charm because it’s been in process long enough at the lender that [the lender] knows they want to do this.

“Home buyers are now putting in half a dozen verbal offers, hoping that on one of them the lender will say yes. What this is doing is bogging down the approval [process] at the mortgage servicers. It’s just gotten to the point that everyone has started engaging in unproductive behavior. It’s a vicious cycle.”

The process of getting a short sale approved involves a packet of documents that includes bank statements, tax returns, letters explaining any other sources of income and a hardship letter explaining why a short sale is being sought.

After the packet is submitted to a mortgage servicer, it has to be entered into the system, a person has to be assigned to it, and an appraisal has to be ordered for the property. On average, it took loan servicers 9 1/2 weeks to respond to a short sale offer, Campbell’s survey found.

“You’ve got to stay on top of these banks,” said James Orrico, a real estate agent at Professional Residential Brokerage LLC in Oak Brook. “I call on my files every day. If you don’t stay on top of them, you’ll lose it.”

But not every real estate agent is willing to deal with the process. Online realty company Redfin doesn’t show or write offers on short sale properties “because of the slim chance that you’ll get the home,” according to its Web site.

A number of factors are contributing to the delay. Lenders say their top priority is keeping people in their homes, and their own and the government’s loan modification programs are taking the bulk of their resources.

“The modification [program] was just like an atom bomb that dropped on [servicers],” said Matt McCabe of National Short Sale Center, a company that acts as a negotiator between borrowers and mortgage lenders. “They had a really hard time reacting to that increased demand.”

Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, which services more than 8 million mortgages, said it has cut the average 60-day response time on short sale offers to 30 to 45 days.

“We’re not satisfied with that number,” said Tamara Swain, senior vice president of real estate owned and short sales at the lender. “The current goal is 15 to 20 days. This has been a big learning process of a function that wasn’t very prominent a couple years ago.”

Also delaying the process is that if a home can’t be saved, servicers are keen on trying to recover as much as possible for what could be multiple investors and that requires a fair amount of due diligence.

“The challenge is buyers always want to pay as little as possible and sellers want to receive as much as possible,” said Tom Kelly, a spokesman for JPMorgan Chase, which services 10.3 million mortgages. “The bank is the server in the middle.”

From a prospective buyer’s standpoint, purchasing a short sale property can be preferable to a foreclosure because if the borrower stills owns the home, he or she is likely to take better care of it.

However, with so many distressed properties for sale, and other homes selling conventionally at drastically reduced prices, there’s a wealth of inventory available allowing buyers to get a quick yea or nay to their offer. Some buyers make offers on multiple short sales or write the offers so they can walk away if a lender doesn’t respond within a certain time frame.

Xia Zhao and her family thought they’d found their next home when they walked into a Jefferson Park townhouse that was listed as a short sale. It was large and near her son’s school. However, they walked away from the offer after a month because they still hadn’t received a response and were worried they wouldn’t be moved in by the time school started.

Instead the family bought a new town home with a price that was cut by the developer in the city’s Old Irving neighborhood.

“I guess we’re not people with extreme patience,” Zhao said. “What if you wait for a couple months and this goes away? You have to start all over again.”

“Most people really aren’t in a situation where they can deal with the uncertainty,” said Zhao’s real estate agent, Eric Rojas at Prudential Rubloff. “Even when you explain that it’s not accepted until the bank accepts it and you build these safeguards into the contract, people are dropping out, left and right. These sales would get done, but people just can’t wait.”

Chicagoan Marie Cabrera, a real estate agent at Baird & Warner, is hoping she has found a purchaser with some patience.

After being unable to sell her own condo in the luxury Palmolive Building, Cabrera decided she didn’t want to simply wait for her lender to foreclosure on it. Earlier this month she listed it as a short sale, priced at $1.15 million. Within a week, she had a cash offer of $1 million that she sent to her lender.

“I have no idea whether the bank will take it,” Cabrera said. “I have an offer that’s solid and they’re willing to wait.”

Copyright © 2009 Chicago Tribune, Mary Ellen Podmolik. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.


Posted by Fred Hintenberger on September 24th, 2009 10:28 PMPost a Comment (0)

Home sales dipped for homes over 250K
September 24th, 2009 10:27 PM

Foreclosures and other financially distressed sellers accounted for about 30 percent of the market. Sales of homes under $100,000 were up 150 percent from a year ago. Sales of homes priced at over $250,000 were down nationally, with the biggest drop of nearly 40 percent coming among homes priced over $2 million.

Existing-home sales dipped unexpectedly last month after a four-month streak of gains, providing evidence that the housing market recovery remains fragile.

The National Association of Realtors said Thursday that sales dropped 2.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.1 million in August, from a pace of 5.24 million in July.

Sales, which were still up 3.4 percent from a year earlier, had been expected to rise to an annual pace of 5.35 million, according to economists surveyed by Thomson Reuters.

"We suspect it is just a temporary blip in the improving trend rather than a sign of renewed weakness," wrote Paul Dales, U.S. economist at Capital Economics.

First-time buyers purchased almost one in three homes last month. New homeowners will get an $8,000 tax credit if they complete the transaction by Nov. 30, which the credit expires.

"There is strength in the market and we will see stronger sales through November," said Patrick Newport, an economist at IHS Global Insight.

Lawrence Yun, the Realtor's chief economist, said the drop may reflect delays in completing sales due to tough lending standards and new rules for appraisals.

Nationwide sales are up nearly 14 percent from their bottom in January, but are still down nearly 30 percent from their peak nearly four years ago. For the housing market to stabilize, Yun said, sales would need to rise to a pace of around 5.5 million to 6 million per year.

If buyers see clear evidence of stable prices, the housing market recovery can be self-sustaining, Yun said, adding, "We are not there yet."

The median sales price was $177,700, down 12.5 percent from $203,200 in the same month last year.

With unemployment and foreclosures rising in the upper end of the housing market, "there will be plenty of more pain for higher-priced properties," wrote Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist with MFR Inc.

In one positive sign, the inventory of unsold homes on the market fell to 3.6 million, from 4 million in July. That's an 8.5 month supply at the current sales pace, and the lowest level in more than two years.

2009 The Associated Press / CNBC.com


Posted by Fred Hintenberger on September 24th, 2009 10:27 PMPost a Comment (0)

FL existing home sales up in August
September 24th, 2009 9:38 PM
Florida’s existing home sales rose in August – marking a full calendar year (12 months) that sales activity increased in the year-to-year comparison, according to the latest housing data released by Florida Realtors®.

Existing home sales rose 28 percent last month with a total of 13,850 homes sold statewide compared to 10,813 homes sold in August 2008, according to Florida Realtors. The state association also reported a 45 percent increase in last month’s statewide sales of existing condos compared to the previous year’s sales figure.

Sixteen of Florida’s metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) reported increased existing home sales in August; 18 MSAs also showed gains in condo sales. A majority of the state’s MSAs have reported increased sales for 14 consecutive months.

“For a year now, statewide sales of existing single-family homes in Florida have increased each month compared to the year-ago figures,” says 2009 Florida Realtors® President Cynthia Shelton, CCIM, CRE, a broker and director of investment sales with Colliers Arnold in Orlando. (CCIM stands for Certified Commercial Investment Member and CRE is the Counselor of Real Estate designation). “This is encouraging news, and while it shows the beginnings of recovery, the housing market still needs time to continue its gradual absorption of housing inventory that will help stabilize home prices. That is why it is critical for Congress to extend the first-time homebuyer tax credit into 2010. And, because it’s now taking longer to finalize a home sale, first-time buyers who want to take advantage of the $8,000 federal tax credit need to act quickly, or they may miss the closing deadline of Nov. 30, 2009.”

Florida’s median sales price for existing homes last month was $147,400; a year ago, it was $188,500 for a 22 percent decrease. Housing industry analysts with the National Association of Realtors® (NAR) note that sales of foreclosures and other distressed properties continue to downwardly distort the median price because they generally sell at a discount relative to traditional homes. The median is the midpoint; half the homes sold for more, half for less.

The national median sales price for existing single-family homes in July 2009 was $178,300, down 14.6 percent from a year earlier, according to NAR. In Massachusetts, the statewide median resales price was $310,000 in July; in California, it was $285,480; in Maryland, it was $273,769; and in New York, it was $205,000.

Signs point toward continued positive momentum in the housing sector, according to NAR’s latest industry outlook. NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun predicts existing home sales will rise through the fourth quarter. “Unless the tax credit is extended, no one should be surprised to see home sales drop in the first quarter of next year,” he said. “However, the fundamentals of the housing market and the economy are trending up, and we expect home sales to generally pick up in the second quarter of 2010. The buyer psychology may be shifting from, ‘Why buy now when I can purchase later,’ to ‘I don’t want to miss out on a recovery.’”

In Florida’s year-to-year comparison for condos, 4,674 units sold statewide compared to 3,222 units in August 2008 for a 45 percent increase. The statewide existing condo median sales price last month was $107,500; in August 2008 it was $158,100 for a 32 percent decrease. The national median existing condo price was $178,800 in July 2009, according to NAR.

Interest rates for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 5.19 percent last month, down significantly from the average rate of 6.48 percent in August 2008, according to Freddie Mac. FAR’s sales figures reflect closings, which typically occur 30 to 90 days after sales contracts are written.

Among the state’s larger markets, the Daytona Beach MSA reported a total of 686 homes sold in August compared to 573 homes a year earlier for a 20 percent increase. The market’s existing home median sales price last month was $132,700; a year ago it was $164,200 for a 19 percent decrease. A total of 135 condos sold in the MSA in August, up 27 percent over the 106 units sold in August 2008. The existing condo median price last month remained level compared to a year ago at $184,300.

© 2009 Florida Realtors®

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on September 24th, 2009 9:38 PMPost a Comment (0)

New Drywall Information website
August 21st, 2009 10:02 AM
WASHINGTON – Aug. 20, 2009 – A new website launched by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) aims to update consumers, builders, drywall manufacturers, and others on its probe into imported Chinese drywall – which has generated complaints of foul odors, metal corrosion, and health problems from those occupying properties containing the defective wallboard.

The CPSC Drywall Information Center will provide details of the investigation – which involves air samples, import tracking and an analysis of the health effects of the Chinese drywall, among other things – and visitors can sign up for e-mail alerts.

The Environmental Protection Agency has determined that Chinese drywall contains 10 times more strontium than U.S. drywall, and it detected the presence of sulfur and two organic compounds in acrylic paint that are not used in U.S. drywall. Approximately 36,000 homes in Florida and many others in Alabama, California, Mississippi, Virginia, and areas of Louisiana hit hard by Hurricane Katrina have been affected.

The CPSC drywall website is located at: http://www.cpsc.gov/info/drywall

Source: Realty Times (08/20/09) Perkins, Broderick

© Copyright 2009 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on August 21st, 2009 10:02 AMPost a Comment (0)

Home prices are where they should be
August 12th, 2009 9:59 PM
New research shows that current home values are just about where they would have been if the real-estate bubble had never inflated and burst.

A long-term view of the market reveals that, even though prices rose and fell dramatically in recent years, they appear to have settled back into historic patterns, according to an analysis by Smith, a University of Central Florida finance professor.

“Most homeowners are within 6 percent of where they would have been had there not been a bubble. The people who have been here since before 2005, they should not have been hurt,” Smith said, though he added: “... A lot of people did buy in 2005 and 2006, and obviously they have been hurt significantly.”

For about a quarter-century, starting in the late 1970s, home prices in Metropolitan Orlando increased 4.7 percent a year on average, according to Smith’s analysis of data from a federal housing-price index. Then the bubble emerged, with prices rising 20 percent in 2005 and 32 percent the following year. Homeowners were elated about their fast-growing equity – at least until the bubble burst in mid-2007.

The sharp drop in prices since then – 22 percent from the 2007 high – may have left the impression that the bursting bubble set back even long-term homeowners for many years to come. Yet prices now are about where you would have expected them to be had the dramatic rise and fall never occurred.

Steve Shapiro, who is trying to sell his Lake Mary home, hadn’t really thought about it before but said it makes sense that the price he is asking for his home of 10 years tracks the area’s long-term pricing trends.

“I think I’m about where it should be with the price,” said the retiree, who has listed his house for $269,000 with Exit Realty Central agent Julie Elrod-Boyd – the same agent who helped him buy it in 1999 for $161,000. He estimated the house would have sold for more than $300,000 about 18 months ago, so the price has retreated 10 percent since then.

“It was nice to think it was worth so much a year and a half ago, but I felt like it was a little inflated,” he said. “All the homes were.”

Volusia County Property Appraiser Morgan Gilreath has obtained results similar to Smith’s in his county.

Gilreath recently plotted home prices from 1996 to the present and concluded they are not far below where they would have been without the bubble. The mid-point, or median, for home prices in Volusia in May was $124,900 – down about $20,000 from where they would have been if they had continued on their long-range trajectory rather than inflating and deflating in recent years, he said.

A year ago, the median in Volusia was about $50,000 above the historic trend line, he said; two years ago, it was flying about $100,000 above that line.

Gilreath said his analysis was not as thorough as Smith’s research at UCF, but both indicate the residential market is not likely to decline much further.

“The point that the charts are telling us is that we’re close to where we think the bottom is going to be,” he said. “The question is: When is it going to turn around? I have evidence that it is turning around here [in Volusia].”

Smith said prices in the region may continue to fall but are less likely to do so now that they are so near the long-term trend line – a “positive indicator” for coming months.

Les Simmonds, president of the Orlando Regional Realtor Association, said people generally measure their home’s current value against what it was worth a year ago – a short-term view of the market.” I feel strongly that, had we not had this bubble, that the median price of the properties would be a little better than they are now, because of the way they’ve been pushed down [in the post-bubble market] by ... [distressed] properties,” he said.

“I said to my wife last week that, when the market was really high, if we had sold then, we could have made four times what we paid for the house.” The problem, he added, is that most of the people who sold at the peak usually then bought near the top of the market. Shapiro said that, once he sells his Lake Mary house, he is ready to retire to a log cabin in north Georgia and forget about the whims of the real-estate market for a while.

The only thing that will rise and fall on his cabin, he said, will be the runners on his front-porch rocking chair.

Copyright © 2009 The Orlando Sentinel, Fla., Mary Shanklin. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on August 12th, 2009 9:59 PMPost a Comment (0)

Tips for Mortgage Shopping
July 31st, 2009 10:55 PM


Printable version (94 KB PDF) Image of a printer  |  ESPAÑOL

5 Tips for Shopping for a Mortgage Photo of house keys on top of a mortgage application.

  1. Know what you can afford.

Review your monthly spending plan to estimate what you can afford to pay for a home, including the mortgage, property taxes, insurance, and monthly maintenance and utilities. Make sure you save for emergencies. Plan ahead to be sure you will be able to afford your monthly payments for several years. Check your credit report to make sure that the information in it is accurate. A higher credit score may help you get a lower interest rate on your mortgage.


  1. Shop around--compare loans from lenders and brokers.

Shopping takes time and energy, but not shopping around can cost you thousands of dollars. You can get a mortgage loan from mortgage lenders or mortgage brokers. Brokers arrange mortgage loans with a lender rather than lend money directly; in other words, brokers sell you a loan from a lender. Neither lenders nor brokers have to find the best loan for you--to find the best loan, you have to do the shopping. For more information on mortgage shopping, see Looking for the Best Mortgage--Shop, Compare, Negotiate.


  1. Understand loan prices and fees.

Many consumers accept the first loan offered and don't realize that they may be able to get a better loan. On any given day, lenders and brokers may offer different interest rates and fees to different consumers for the same loan, even when those consumers have the same loan qualifications. Keep in mind that lenders and brokers also consider the profit they receive if you agree to the terms of a loan with higher fees, higher points, or a higher interest rate. Shopping around is your best way to avoid more expensive loans.


  1. Know the risks and benefits of loan options.

Mortgages have many features--some have fixed interest rates and some have adjustable rates; some have payment adjustments; on some you pay only the interest on the loan for a while and then you pay down the principal (the loan amount); some charge you a penalty for paying the loan off early; and some have a large payment due at the end of the loan (a balloon payment). Consider all mortgage features, the APR (annual percentage rate), and the settlement costs. Ask your lender to calculate how much your monthly payments could be a year from now, and 5 or 10 years from now. A mortgage shopping worksheet (33 KB PDF) can help you identify the features of different loans. Mortgage calculators can help you compare payments and the equity you could build with different mortgage loans.


  1. Get advice from trusted sources.

A mortgage loan is one of the most complex, most expensive financial commitments you will ever assume--it’s okay to ask for help. Talk with a trusted housing counselor or a real estate attorney that you hire to review your documents before you sign them. You can find a list of counseling resources at NeighborWorks and on the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) website or by calling (800) 569-4287.


Posted by Fred Hintenberger on July 31st, 2009 10:55 PMPost a Comment (0)

FL Home Sales Up in June
July 23rd, 2009 9:25 PM
Fla. – July 23, 2009 – Florida’s existing home sales rose in June – the 10th consecutive month that sales activity showed gains in the year-to-year comparison, according to the latest housing data released by the Florida Association of Realtors® (FAR). Statewide sales in June also increased over the previous month’s sales level in both the existing home and existing condominium markets. And, for the second month in a row, the statewide median sales price for existing homes was higher than the previous month’s statewide median.

Existing home sales rose 28 percent last month with a total of 15,850 homes sold statewide compared to 12,339 homes sold in June 2008, according to FAR. Statewide existing home sales in June increased 13.8 percent over May’s statewide activity.

Florida Realtors also reported a 39 percent rise in statewide sales of existing condos in June; existing condo sales last month rose 8.3 percent over the total units sold in May.

Sixteen of Florida's metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) reported increased existing-home sales in June and 14 MSAs also showed gains in condo sales. A majority of the state’s MSAs have reported increased sales for the past year (12 consecutive months).

Florida’s median sales price for existing homes last month was $148,000; a year ago, it was $205,300 for a 28 percent decrease. However, the statewide existing home median price in June increased 2.49 percent over May’s median price; it also was higher than the statewide median price reported each month since the start of 2009. According to housing industry analysts with the National Association of Realtors® (NAR), sales of foreclosures and other distressed properties continue to downwardly distort the median price because they generally sell at a discount relative to traditional homes. The median is the midpoint; half the homes sold for more, half for less.

The national median sales price for existing single-family homes in May 2009 was $172,900, down 16.1 percent from a year earlier, according to NAR. In Massachusetts, the statewide median resales price was $284,000 in May; in California, it was $267,570; in Maryland, it was $265,724; and in New York, it was $189,000.

NAR’s latest housing industry outlook notes the $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers is boosting the sector. “Strong activity by entry level buyers is helping to absorb inventory and allow some existing owners to make a trade,” said NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun. “However, the increase in sales is less than expected because poor appraisals are stalling transactions. The big question is how much the appraisal issue will impact the ability of contracts to go to closing.”

In Florida’s year-to-year comparison for condos, 5,241 units sold statewide compared to 3,771 units in June 2008 for a 39 percent increase. The statewide existing condo median sales price last month was $112,900; in June 2008 it was $180,400 for a 37 percent decrease. The national median existing condo price was $173,800 in May 2009, according to NAR.

Interest rates for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 5.42 percent last month, down significantly from the average rate of 6.32 percent in June 2008, according to Freddie Mac. FAR’s sales figures reflect closings, which typically occur 30 to 90 days after sales contracts are written.

Among the state’s smaller markets, the Punta Gorda MSA reported a total of 216 homes sold in June compared to 196 homes a year ago for a 10 percent increase. The existing home median sales price was $145,600; a year ago, it was $141,000 for a 3 percent increase. The market’s existing condo median price last month was $140,000; a year earlier, it was $160,000 for a 13 percent decrease.

© 2009 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on July 23rd, 2009 9:25 PMPost a Comment (0)

Florida's 8K 1st Time Home Buyer Program
July 3rd, 2009 6:29 AM
Florida’s $8K program effective – Florida created a program to help first-time homebuyers get their federal tax credit early, allowing them to use up to $8,000 toward a downpayment. The effective date for the program is July 1; however, it will probably be another few weeks before the funds are available. As a result, some Realtors struggling to help homebuyers find the system confusing.

While most first-time homebuyers qualify for the tax credit (given by the government as an income tax rebate regardless of tax owed), they once had to buy a home first, submit the info to the IRS through their tax return, and wait for the $8,000 rebate. To help these buyers get the money early enough to use it as a downpayment, the State of Florida created a program of bridge loans, the Florida Homebuyer Opportunity Program (FLHOP), where money can be borrowed from the state and then paid back after the new homeowner receives his tax credit.

Under a different federal program, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has done something similar, yet with a significant difference: The federal program applies to FHA loans only, and buyers must still come up with a minimum downpayment of 3.5 percent.
 
“FAR’s Office of Public Policy has been getting a lot of questions from across the state regarding downpayment assistance for those who qualify for the federal first-time homebuyer tax credit,” says Florida Association of Realtors (FAR) Vice President of Public Policy John Sebree. “Given that there is a state downpayment plan and a federal downpayment plan (and at least one special exemption), it definitely gets confusing, and details have been slow to emerge. Many Florida Realtors say local housing authorities don’t have all the information they need to move forward with the state program, and some Realtors report that bankers are steering clear of the downpayment assistance programs altogether.”

Florida Homebuyer Opportunity Program (FLHOP)

The Florida Legislature created the state program during the recent legislative session, and it’s part of the 2010 budget effective July 1, 2009. Many details remain sketchy, but Sebree reports the following:

• Money for homebuyers may not be available until the first week of August. Lawmakers funded the program through doc stamp taxes applicable in the new fiscal year rather than through a lump sum commitment; and since today is the start of the new fiscal year, the program won’t be fully funded until the state collects new doc stamp taxes.

• Florida’s downpayment loan program can work with FHA loans. Florida Housing Finance Corporation (FHFC) – the state agency that funnels housing money to local housing agencies – received confirmation from FHA that borrowers who access the $8,000 tax credit through a state or local government program may use it to make up the required 3.5 percent downpayment, unlike the FHA downpayment loan program through private lenders.

• Florida’s local housing administrators will oversee the downpayment funds at the local level. (To find the administrator in your area, go to: http://apps.floridahousing.org/StandAlone/FHFC_ECM/AppPage_SHIPLGContacts.aspx). For local housing authorities, the program is similar to the SHIP program (State Housing Initiatives Partnership) with one major difference – the income limits. Currently, SHIP uses Area Median Income (AMI) and those are typically lower, and calculated differently, than the federal tax credit limit of $75,000. The $75,000 for a single income tax filer ($150,000 for joint filers) will be used for FLHOP.

• Realtors can start to promote the program to potential homebuyers. It takes time to close on a home, and local housing authorities should be taking applications now.
 
• FHFC says they’ve trained local administrators on procedures for the Florida downpayment program. Local housing authorities will have flexibility over the $8,000 loan, be able to include penalties, and create a structure dictating how the new homebuyer will pay back the money.

“It’s important to note that this money is a bridge loan to buyers; but once it’s repaid, local governments and housing authorities can keep the money and use it locally for affordable housing projects,” Sebree says. “This is a win/win for them. If the offices seem unwilling to work with Realtors, they probably don’t understand the program themselves yet.”

For specific questions about the $8,000 tax credit, homebuyers should consult a tax professional.

Resources for understanding the tax credit and bridge loans

FAR’s Homebuyer Center: http://www.floridarealtors.org/AboutFar/homebuyercenter/index.cfm

NAR’s The Basics: 2009 First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit: http://www.realtor.org/home_buyers_and_sellers/2009_first_time_home_buyer_tax_credit?lid=ronav0019.

© 2009 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on July 3rd, 2009 6:29 AMPost a Comment (1)

International buyers like Florida
June 17th, 2009 7:18 PM
International buyers confident of Fla. recovery

MIAMI – June 15, 2009 – Gerson Lehman Group reports that international realty buyers believe the Florida housing market is poised for recovery, and they are paying close attention to distressed properties in the state. The report says these international buyers view homes in the United States as “desirable, profitable and secure” investments.

“Those who delay buying their dream home in Florida may soon find that they have to pay considerably more for the same property in just a few months,” advises the report’s author, Howard Liggett, president of Distressed Real Estate Consulting Services.

Liggett cites data from the National Association of Realtors® and the Florida Association of Realtors® indicating that 25 percent of international buyers are Canadian, 21 percent are British, and 21 percent are western European.

Source: ?Halifax International Expat Focus (06/12/2009) Musk, Jamie

© Copyright 2009 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on June 17th, 2009 7:18 PMPost a Comment (0)

Florida's population change
June 7th, 2009 8:12 AM
 Migration – the movement of people into and out of a geographic area – impacts a state’s economy and real estate market. Because birth and death rates are usually low and stable, migration often accounts for the largest changes in population growth, decline and redistribution.

Migration patterns have a big impact on real estate professionals, and Florida has one of the greatest levels of domestic migration. Florida’s total population was 18.3 million in 2008, and, according to the Census Bureau estimates, will reach 19.3 million by July 2010, and approximately 23.4 million by 2020. The Census Bureau estimates a 79 percent increase in total population between 2000 and 2030, ranking Florida third highest in projected population growth.

Twenty-two percent of the state’s population in 2007 was under 18 years old, and 17 percent was 65 years and older. By 2015, 21 percent of the state’s population is projected to be under 18 years of age, and 19.5 percent will be 65 years and older. Furthermore, Florida is a favorite state for many second home buyers, both from other areas in the U.S. as well as from abroad. While the state still attracts retirees, it also appeals to many young college graduates.

A Florida Association of Realtors®’ study conducted by the National Association of Realtors® analyzes mobility and migration trends for Florida, and includes information on recent second home purchase activity. It includes projections for future migration patterns, including expected housing demand by different demographic segments, states with high volumes of in-migration to Florida, and expected changes in the existing home sales.

The report also compares Florida second home purchases to other states; mortgage data on second home purchases compared with primary residences; and recent changes in purchases by income and race.

The complete study is available on floridarealtors.org at:
http://www.floridarealtors.org/LegislativeCenter/Research/index.cfm

© 2009 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on June 7th, 2009 8:12 AMPost a Comment (0)

Pending home sales up for 3rd straight month
June 2nd, 2009 8:32 PM
Record low mortgage interest rates boosted pending home sales for the third consecutive month, with some benefit now from the first-time buyer tax credit, according to the National Association of Realtors®.

The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contracts signed in April, rose 6.7 percent to 90.3 from a reading of 84.6 in March, and is 3.2 percent above April 2008 when it was 87.5.

“Housing affordability conditions have been at historic highs, but now the $8,000 first-time buyer tax credit is beginning to impact the market,” says Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist. “Since first-time buyers must finalize their purchase by Nov. 30 to get the credit, we expect greater activity in the months ahead, and that should spark more sales by repeat buyers.”

NAR President Charles McMillan says there are numerous buyer assistance programs around the country. “Some states are offering bridge loans that allow first-time buyers to use the tax credit for downpayment and closing costs, but there are many other local government and nonprofit programs available to buyers, depending on location.

“Just last week, HUD announced that qualifying buyers can use the tax credit for closing costs on FHA loans to buy down the interest rate or make a larger downpayment.”

NAR’s Housing Affordability Index (HAI) is in record territory. The index rose to 174.8 in April from an upwardly revised 171.9 in March, and was the second highest monthly reading on record after peaking at 176.9 in January of this year. The HAI is a broad measure of housing affordability using consistent values and assumptions over time, which examines the relationship between home prices, mortgage interest rates and family income. Tracking began in 1970.

A median-income family, earning $60,900, could afford a home costing $296,800 in April with a 20 percent downpayment, assuming 25 percent of gross income is devoted to mortgage principal and interest. Affordability conditions for first-time buyers with the same income and small downpayments are roughly 80 percent of that amount. The affordable price was well above the median existing single-family home price in April, which was $169,800.

Yun cautions that the reporting sample for pending home sales is smaller than that of existing-home sales, so it is subject to greater variability.

“In addition, the relationship between contracts on pending home sales and closings on existing-home sales is taking longer than in the past for several reasons,” Yun says. “Mortgage processing time has increased, it is taking many months to close on those homes requiring short sales with lender approval, and some sales are falling through at the last moment.”

The total number of existing-home sales is expected to improve but with dramatic local market variation in the timing of recovery. “The market has already bottomed in some areas, but this is an unusual housing cycle with some areas improving rapidly while others languish or decline,” Yun says.

© 2009 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on June 2nd, 2009 8:32 PMPost a Comment (0)

8K Downpayment assistance update
May 30th, 2009 3:48 PM
WASHINGTON – May 29, 2009 – The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) released more details today about its program to help first-time homebuyers use a tax credit as part of a downpayment.

HUD announced the program on May 12 at the National Association of Realtors® Housing Summit. In the interim, HUD posted an announcement and then immediately took it down, leading to speculation that the program would be pulled. In response, HUD said the rules had simply not been finalized, and the original announcement had been posted in error.

“We’ve been eager for word from the federal government since the new FHA downpayment assistance plan was announced, and even more so after the program details were first published and then quickly pulled,” says John Sebree, FAR vice president of public policy. “Luckily, that turns out to be a minor setback and there will be a federal downpayment program to complement the $30 million we were successful in securing in the Florida budget.”

The most significant change involves the amount of downpayment required by qualified first-time homebuyers. FHA mortgages require a 3.5 percent downpayment, and the $8,000 tax credit cannot be used to override that requirement. Once the 3.5 percent downpayment requirement has been met, however, the tax credit can be applied to additional costs, including a higher downpayment, paying points to lower the mortgage rate, and/or closing costs. Lenders will treat the tax credit money as a second lien on the home until it’s paid back.

“Mortgage industry leaders have indicated that this type of product may not be immediately available to consumers,” says Sebree. Since lenders will oversee the tax credit loan, they must create internal programs to handle the process.

Lenders have some flexibility on payback requirements for the upfront loan of the tax credit, though HUD also created rules to protect homebuyers from onerous terms. To read the complete overview in Mortgagee Letter 2009-15, go here.
 

© 2009 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on May 30th, 2009 3:48 PMPost a Comment (0)

No closing cost for first time home buyers
May 13th, 2009 9:44 PM
Federal program to help first-time buyers use tax credit for downpayment

Confused about the first-time buyer benefits?

Two programs will allow first-time buyers (those who have not owned a home for at least three years) to use their income tax credit toward a downpayment. Neither the Florida program nor the HUD program has been fully fleshed out, however, and it’s unclear how soon money will become available under either program. FAR will report on all details as they’re released through the floridarealtors.org Web site and FAR’s daily EarlyBird e-newsletter. 


WASHINGTON – May 13, 2009 – First-time homebuyers will soon have another option if they want to use their $8,000 tax credit toward a downpayment. On the tails of a Florida-created program that Gov. Charlie Crist is expected to sign into law, the federal government announced its own downpayment assistance program at the National Association of Realtors® Midyear Legislative Meetings & Trade Expo taking place this week in Washington, D.C.

While the tax credit applies to “first-time homebuyers,” the term is misleading. In general, anyone who hasn’t owned a home for the past three years is considered a first-timer under the program. Shaun Donovan, secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), hopes to have additional details available within a few days, though it’s still unclear how soon homebuyers can apply for the credit.

Donovan said that the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) would allow its lenders to credit homeowners up to $8,000. He made the announcement to several thousand Realtors yesterday at a special daylong session called, The Real Estate Summit: Advancing the U.S. Economy.

“We all want to enable FHA consumers to access the homebuyer tax credit funds when they close on their home loans, so that the cash can be used as a downpayment,” Donovan said. According to Donovan, FHA approved lenders will be permitted to “monetize” the tax credit by using short-term bridge loans. Donovan also said that more will be done, and the Obama administration plans to further stabilize the housing market.

“I do think we have some early signs that the market overall is stabilizing,” said Donovan. “Since January, we’ve seen both home sales moving up and down around a relatively stable number, and we are seeing the first signs that the rapid decline in home prices is starting to abate.”

© 2009 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Posted by Fred Hintenberger on May 13th, 2009 9:44 PMPost a Comment (0)

Recent Posts:

Archive:

My Favorite Blogs:

Sites That Link to This Blog:

                                                               

                              

 


Charles Rutenberg Realty 1545 S. Belcher Rd Clearwater, FL 33764
Phone: Cell: Fax:

Why Fred? | Pinellas Stats,Info,&Attractions | Tampa | Largo | New Construction | New Homes | Property Search | Free Account | Daily Real Estate & Local News | Clearwater | St Petersburg | Links: Schools,Tax,Top Sites | For Buyers | Download Adobe Acrobat | Real Estate Glossary | Featured Homes | Listing your home | Home | Search Area Homes | FL Properties | Mortgage Points Calc | Mortgage Qualifier Calc | Mortgage Calculators | Blog

Copyright © 2010 Charles Rutenberg Realty
Portions Copyright © 2010 a la mode, inc.
Another XSite by a la mode, inc. | Admin LoginTerms of UseSite Map
All rate, payment, and area information are estimates and approximations only.